!?@020 464/6976/15-F
><5@ @O4:0 72VBC 26
#%
?@> 2V4:@8BBO ?@>20465==O C A?@02V
08.09.2015
!C44O !8EV2AL:>3> @09>==>3> AC4C <. L2>20 04G5=:> .. @>73;O=C2H8 <0B5@V0;8 ?>7>2=>W 70O28 C1;VG=>3> 0:FV>=5@=>3> B>20@8AB20 «45O 0=:»» 4> !_1, !_2 ?@> ABO3=5==O 1>@3C 70 :@548B=8< 4>3>2>@><, -
!":
0=0 ?>7>2=0 70O20 2V4?>2V40T 28<>30<, 28:;045=8< 2 AB.AB. 119,120 & #:@0W=8, ?V4;O30T @>73;O4C 2 AC40E 7030;L=>W N@8A48:FVW B0 ?V4AC4=0 !8EV2AL:><C @09>==><C AC4C <. L2>20.
5@CNG8AL AB.AB. 11,107-114,119-120, 122, 127-128 & #:@0W=8, -
#%:
V4:@8B8 ?@>20465==O C A?@02V 70 ?>7>2=>N 70O2>N C1;VG=>3> 0:FV>=5@=>3> B>20@8AB20 «45O 0=:»» 4> !_1, !_2 ?@> ABO3=5==O 1>@3C 70 :@548B=8< 4>3>2>@><.
@87=0G8B8 A?@02C 4> AC4>2>3> @>73;O4C =0 10 3>4. 30 E2. 17.09.2015 @>:C 7 28:;8:>< >AV1, O:V 15@CBL CG0ABL C A?@02V.
>73;O4 A?@028 2V41C45BLAO 2 ?@8<VI5==V !8EV2AL:>3> @09>==>3> AC4C <.L2>20 (04@5A0 AC4C <.L2V2, 2C;.'>;>2AL:>3>, 2, (5 ?>25@E, 505 :01V=5B).
>?VN 40=>W CE20;8 =04VA;0B8 >A>10<, O:V 15@CBL CG0ABL C A?@02V, 2V4?>2V40GC B0:>6 :>?VN ?>7>2=>W 70O28 7 :>?VO<8 4>40=8E 4> =5W 4>:C<5=BV2, 0 B@5BV9 >A>1V :>?VN ?>7>2=>W 70O28.
V4?>2V40GC C AB@>: 4> AC4>2>3> @>73;O4C ?>40B8 AC4C ?8AL<>2V 70?5@5G5==O ?@>B8 ?>7>2C B0 ?>A8;0==O =0 4>:078, O:8<8 2>=8 >13@C=B>2CNBLAO.
>7OA=8B8, I> >A>18, O:V 15@CBL CG0ABL C A?@02V, 4;O ?V4B25@465==O A2>WE 28<>3 01> 70?5@5G5=L 7>1>2O70=V =040B8 2AV =0O2=V C =8E 4>:078 01> ?>2V4><8B8 ?@> =8E AC4 4> ?>G0B:C @>73;O4C A?@028 ?> ACBV.
#E20;0 <>65 1CB8 >A:0@65=0 ;8H5 I>4> =54>B@8<0==O ?@028; ?V4AC4=>ABV, 2 V=HV9 G0AB8=V CE20;0 >A:0@65==N =5 ?V4;O30T.
!C44O 04G5=:> ..
The court decision No. 50139166, Sykhivskyi District Court of Lviv City was adopted on 08.09.2015. The procedural form is Civil, and the decision form is Court ruling. On this page, you will find essential data about this court decision. We offer convenient and quick access to current court decisions so that you can keep up to date with the most recent court precedents. Our database covers the full range of information you need, allowing you to find key data conveniently.
This decision relates to case No. 464/6976/15-ц. Firms, which are mentioned in the text of this judgment: