!?@020 369/3955/15
>;>2CNG89 C V=AB0=FVW >20;LGC: ..@>20465==O 22-F/780/4776/15
>?>2V40G C 2 V=AB0=FVW !_1
#%
?@> 2V4:@8BBO 0?5;OFV9=>3> ?@>20465==O
10.09.2015 <.8W2
!C44O ?5;OFV9=>3> AC4C 8W2AL:>W >1;0ABV C;L .., @>73;O=C2H8 <0B5@V0;8 F82V;L=>W A?@028 70 0?5;OFV9=>N A:0@3>N !_2 =0 CE20;C 8T2> !2OB>H8=AL:>3> @09>==>3> AC4C 8W2AL:>W >1;0ABV 2V4 09 G5@2=O 2015 @>:C ?@> ?>25@=5==O ?>7>2=>W 70O28 C A?@02V 70 ?>7>2>< !_2 4> !_3, ?@820B=>3> =>B0@VCA0 8W2AL:>3> <VAL:>3> =>B0@V0;L=>3> >:@C3C !_4, B@5BV >A>18: !;C610 C A?@020E 4VB59 B0 AV<W 8T2>-!2OB>H8=AL:>W @09>==>W 45@602=>W 04<V=VAB@0FVW 8W2AL:>W >1;0ABV, !_5, 5TAB@0FV9=0 A;C610 8T2>-!2OB>H8=AL:>3> @09>==>3> C?@02;V==O NAB8FVW 8W2AL:>W >1;0ABV, ?@> 287=0==O =54V9A=8<8 4>3>2>@C V?>B5:8 2V4 10 :2VB=O 2012 @>:C, 4>40B:>2>3> 4>3>2>@C 1 4> 4>3>2>@C V?>B5:8 2V4 06 ;8?=O 2012 @>:C, 4>3>2>@C ?>78:8 2V4 10 :2VB=O 2012 @>:C, ?@02>G8=C 2V4 10 :2VB=O 2014 @>:C, 287=0==O =54V9A=8< @VH5==O 2V4 10 :2VB=O 2014 @>:C ?@> 45@602=C @5TAB@0FVN ?@02 V WE >1BO65=L, A:0AC20==O 70?8AC C 5@602=><C @5TAB@V ?@02 2;0A=>ABV, 70AB>AC20==O =0A;V4:V2 =54V9A=>ABV ?@02>G8=V2, -
2 A B 0 = > 2 8 2 :
?5;OFV9=C A:0@3C ?>40=> 4> =0;56=>3> AC4C C 2AB0=>2;5=V 70:>=>< AB@>:8, >A>1>N, I> <0T ?@02> =0 0?5;OFV9=5 >A:0@65==O. 0 D>@<>N V 7<VAB>< 2V4?>2V40T AB. 295 & #:@0W=8.
5@CNG8AL AB. AB. 297, 298 & #:@0W=8, AC44O, -
C E 2 0 ; 8 2 :
V4:@8B8 0?5;OFV9=5 ?@>20465==O 70 0?5;OFV9=>N A:0@3>N !_2 =0 CE20;C 8T2> !2OB>H8=AL:>3> @09>==>3> AC4C 8W2AL:>W >1;0ABV 2V4 09 G5@2=O 2015 @>:C.
#E20;0 >A:0@65==N =5 ?V4;O30T.
!C44O ?5;OFV9=>3> AC4C
8W2AL:>W >1;0ABV: !_1
The court decision No. 50104083, Kyiv Regional Court of Appeal was adopted on 10.09.2015. The procedural form is Civil, and the decision form is Court ruling. On this page, you will find essential information about this court decision. We provide convenient and quick access to current court decisions so that you can keep up to date with the most recent court precedents. Our database covers the full range of information you need, allowing you to find important information conveniently.
This decision relates to case No. 369/3955/15. Organisations, which are mentioned in the text of this judgment: