!?@020 369/3955/15
>;>2CNG89 C V=AB0=FVW >20;LGC: ..@>20465==O 22-F/780/4776/15
>?>2V40G C 2 V=AB0=FVW !_1
#%
?@> 2V4:@8BBO 0?5;OFV9=>3> ?@>20465==O
10.09.2015 <.8W2
!C44O ?5;OFV9=>3> AC4C 8W2AL:>W >1;0ABV C;L .., @>73;O=C2H8 <0B5@V0;8 F82V;L=>W A?@028 70 0?5;OFV9=>N A:0@3>N !_2 =0 CE20;C 8T2> !2OB>H8=AL:>3> @09>==>3> AC4C 8W2AL:>W >1;0ABV 2V4 09 G5@2=O 2015 @>:C ?@> ?>25@=5==O ?>7>2=>W 70O28 C A?@02V 70 ?>7>2>< !_2 4> !_3, ?@820B=>3> =>B0@VCA0 8W2AL:>3> <VAL:>3> =>B0@V0;L=>3> >:@C3C !_4, B@5BV >A>18: !;C610 C A?@020E 4VB59 B0 AV<W 8T2>-!2OB>H8=AL:>W @09>==>W 45@602=>W 04<V=VAB@0FVW 8W2AL:>W >1;0ABV, !_5, 5TAB@0FV9=0 A;C610 8T2>-!2OB>H8=AL:>3> @09>==>3> C?@02;V==O NAB8FVW 8W2AL:>W >1;0ABV, ?@> 287=0==O =54V9A=8<8 4>3>2>@C V?>B5:8 2V4 10 :2VB=O 2012 @>:C, 4>40B:>2>3> 4>3>2>@C 1 4> 4>3>2>@C V?>B5:8 2V4 06 ;8?=O 2012 @>:C, 4>3>2>@C ?>78:8 2V4 10 :2VB=O 2012 @>:C, ?@02>G8=C 2V4 10 :2VB=O 2014 @>:C, 287=0==O =54V9A=8< @VH5==O 2V4 10 :2VB=O 2014 @>:C ?@> 45@602=C @5TAB@0FVN ?@02 V WE >1BO65=L, A:0AC20==O 70?8AC C 5@602=><C @5TAB@V ?@02 2;0A=>ABV, 70AB>AC20==O =0A;V4:V2 =54V9A=>ABV ?@02>G8=V2, -
2 A B 0 = > 2 8 2 :
?5;OFV9=C A:0@3C ?>40=> 4> =0;56=>3> AC4C C 2AB0=>2;5=V 70:>=>< AB@>:8, >A>1>N, I> <0T ?@02> =0 0?5;OFV9=5 >A:0@65==O. 0 D>@<>N V 7<VAB>< 2V4?>2V40T AB. 295 & #:@0W=8.
5@CNG8AL AB. AB. 297, 298 & #:@0W=8, AC44O, -
C E 2 0 ; 8 2 :
V4:@8B8 0?5;OFV9=5 ?@>20465==O 70 0?5;OFV9=>N A:0@3>N !_2 =0 CE20;C 8T2> !2OB>H8=AL:>3> @09>==>3> AC4C 8W2AL:>W >1;0ABV 2V4 09 G5@2=O 2015 @>:C.
#E20;0 >A:0@65==N =5 ?V4;O30T.
!C44O ?5;OFV9=>3> AC4C
8W2AL:>W >1;0ABV: !_1
The court decision No. 50104083, Kyiv Regional Court of Appeal was adopted on 10.09.2015. The procedural form is Civil, and the decision form is Court ruling. On this page, you will find important data about this court decision. We offer convenient and quick access to actual court decisions so that you can keep up to date with the most recent court precedents. Our database contains the full range of information you need, allowing you to find important data easily.
This decision relates to case No. 369/3955/15. Legal Entities, which are mentioned in the text of this judgment: