!?@020 367/2025/14
>;>2CNG89 C V=AB0=FVW V:C;V= . .@>20465==O 22-F/780/6815/14
>?>2V40G C 2 V=AB0=FVW !_10B53>@VO 58
17.11.2014
#%
<5=5< #:@0W=8
17 ;8AB>?040 2014 @>:C AC44O ?5;OFV9=>3> AC4C 8W2AL:>W >1;0ABV @8E>4L:> .., @>73;O=C2H8 <0B5@V0;8 F82V;L=>W A?@028 70 0?5;OFV9=>N A:0@3>N !_2 =0 @VH5==O @?V=AL:>3> <VAL:>3> AC4C 8W2AL:>W >1;0ABV 2V4 23 6>2B=O 2014 @>:C 70 ?>7>2>< @>:C@>@0 <. @?5=O 8W2AL:>W >1;0ABV 2 V=B5@5A0E 45@6028 2 >A>1V CG0=AL:>W <VAL:>W @048 8W2AL:>W >1;0ABV 4> !_2 ?@> ABO3=5==O 701>@3>20=>ABV 70 2V4=>2=C 20@BVABL 75;5=8E =0A0465=L,-
! " :
VH5==O< @?V=AL:>3> <VAL:>3> AC4C 8W2AL:>W >1;0ABV 2V4 23 6>2B=O 2014 @>:C ?>7>2 704>2>;5=>.
5 ?>3>46CNG8AL V7 2:070=8< @VH5==O<, !_2.. ?>402 0?5;OFV9=C A:0@3C, O:0 >?;0G5=0 AC4>28< 71>@>< =0 =52V@=89 @0EC=>:.
?5;OFV9=0 A:0@30 <0T 1CB8 >?;0G5=0 AC4>28< 71>@>< =0 @0EC=>: 31217206780001, :>4 :;0A8DV:0FVW 4>E>4V2 1N465BC 22030001, >45@6C20G :>HBV2: 8W2AL:0 >1;0ABL, 10=: >45@6C20G0: # !# C 8W2AL:>W >1;0ABV, $: 821018, :>4 >45@6C20G0 (:>4 70 # 37955989) :>4 # 02892020.
>:C<5=B8, I> ?V4B25@46CNBL A?;0BC AC4>2>3> 71>@C ?>40NBLAO 4> ?5;OFV9=>3> AC4C 8W2AL:>W >1;0ABV 2 >@83V=0;V.
B65, 70 ?@028;0<8 AB.297 & #:@0W=8, 4> 0?5;OFV9=>W A:0@38, O:0 =5 >D>@<;5=0 2V4?>2V4=> 4> 28<>3, 2AB0=>2;5=8E AB.295 =0720=>3> >45:AC, 0 B0:>6 C @07V =5A?;0B8 AC<8 AC4>2>3> 71>@C 70AB>A>2CNBLAO ?>;>65==O AB. 121 & #:@0W=8, B><C 0?5;OFV9=C A:0@3C A;V4 70;8H8B8 157 @CEC, =0402H8 0?5;O=BC AB@>: 4;O CAC=5==O 2:070=8E =54>;V:V2.
5@CNG8AL AB. AB. 121, 297 & #:@0W=8,
#%:
?5;OFV9=C A:0@3C !_2 =0 @VH5==O @?V=AL:>3> <VAL:>3> AC4C 8W2AL:>W >1;0ABV 2V4 23 6>2B=O 2014 @>:C 70;8H8B8 157 @CEC B0 =040B8 0?5;O=BC AB@>: 4;O CAC=5==O 2:070=8E =54>;V:V2 =0 AB@>: ?OBL 4=V2 7 <><5=BC >B@8<0==O :>?VW CE20;8 4;O CAC=5==O 2:070=8E =54>;V:V2, 2 V=H><C 28?04:C 0?5;OFV9=0 A:0@30 22060B8<5BLAO =5?>40=>N.
#E20;0 >A:0@65==N =5 ?V4;O30T.
!C44O ?5;OFV9=>3> AC4C
8W2AL:>W >1;0ABV !_1
The court decision No. 45050894, Kyiv Regional Court of Appeal was adopted on 17.11.2014. The procedural form is Civil, and the decision form is Court ruling. On this page, you will find key data about this court decision. We provide convenient and quick access to current court decisions so that you can keep up to date with the most recent court precedents. Our database includes the full range of information you need, allowing you to find important data quickly.
This decision relates to case No. 367/2025/14. Companies, which are mentioned in the text of this judgment: