'!, !# % !, !"
!?@020 622/1077/15-F
2-=/622/83/2015
#%
<5=5< #:@0W=8
28.10.2015 @>:C A<B.>;>GV2
!C44O >;>GV2AL:>3> @09>==>3> AC4C %0@:V2AL:>W >1;0ABV (010A .!., @>73;O=C2H8 70O2C 0:FV>=5@=>W :><?0=VW «%0@:V2>1;5=5@3>» ?@> 2840GC AC4>2>3> =0:07C ?@> ABO3=5==O 7 !_1 701>@3>20=>ABV 70 A?>68BC 5;5:B@>5=5@3VN 2 AC<V 1242 3@=. 24 :>?., -
!":
31.08.2015 @>:C ?@54AB02=8: «%0@:V2>1;5=5@3>» !_2 725@=C;0AO 4> AC4C 7 2V4?>2V4=>N 70O2>N, 2 O:V9 ?@>A8BL 2840B8 AC4>289 =0:07 ?@> ABO3=5==O 7 !_1 701>@3>20=>ABV 70 A?>68BC 5;5:B@>5=5@3VN 2 AC<V 1242,24 3@=. ?> >A>1>2><C @0EC=:C 60165.
0 28:>=0==O 28<>3 AB.122 & #:@0W=8 4> # ! #:@0W=8 2 %0@:V2AL:V9 >1;0ABV 02.09.2015 @>:C =04VA;0=> 70?8B I>4> <VAFO @5TAB@0FVW 1>@6=8:0.
28.10.2015 @. ?@54AB02=8: «%0@:V2>1;5=5@3>» !_2 (4>2V@5=VABL 2V4 30.04.2015 @.) 725@=C;0AL 4> AC4C 7 70O2>N ?@> ?>25@=5==O 707=0G5=>W 70O28.
V4?>2V4=> 4> ?>;>65=L ?. 2 G. 1 AB. 100 & #:@0W=8 AC44O ?>25@B0T 70O2C ?@> 2840GC AC4>2>3> =0:07C C @07V O:I>, 4> <><5=BC 2V4:@8BBO =0:07=>3> ?@>20465==O =04V9H;> 725@=5==O 70O2=8:0 ?@> ?>25@=5==O 70O28 ?@> 2840GC AC4>2>3> =0:07C.
@0E>2CNG8, I> =0:070=5 ?@>20465==O 70 70O2>N, I5 =5 2V4:@8B>, 70O20 ?V4;O30T 704>2>;5==N.
5@CNG8AL ?. 2 G. 1 AB. 100 & #:@0W=8, -
#%:
>25@=CB8 70O2C 0:FV>=5@=>W :><?0=VW «%0@:V2>1;5=5@3>» ?@> 2840GC AC4>2>3> =0:07C ?@> ABO3=5==O 7 !_1 701>@3>20=>ABV 70 A?>68BC 5;5:B@>5=5@3VN 2 AC<V 1242 3@=. 24 :>?.
#E20;0 <>65 1CB8 >A:0@65=0 4> 0?5;OFV9=>3> AC4C %0@:V2AL:>W >1;0ABV ?@>BO3>< 5 4=V2 H;OE>< ?>40GV 0?5;OFV9=>W A:0@38 G5@57 >;>GV2AL:89 @09>==89 AC4 %0@:V2AL:>W >1;0ABV.
!C44O: (010A . !.
The court decision No. 52991981, Zolochiv District Court of Kharkiv Oblast was adopted on 28.10.2015. The procedural form is Civil, and the decision form is Court ruling. On this page, you will find important data about this court decision. We provide convenient and quick access to current court decisions so that you can keep up to date with the most recent court precedents. Our database includes the full range of information you need, allowing you to find necessary data quickly.
This decision relates to case No. 622/1077/15-ц. Companies, which are mentioned in the text of this judgment: