0B0 4>:C<5=BC 29.10.2015
# 413/8074/13-F
@>20465==O 2-2/420/19/15
# %
?@> 2V4:@8BBO ?@>20465==O
29 6>2B=O 2015 @>:C A<B. >2>?A:>2
!C44O >2>?A:>2AL:>3> @09>==>3> AC4C C30=AL:>W >1;0ABV >B0?5=:> . . @>73;O=C2H8 CE20;C ?5;OFV9=>3> AC4C C30=AL:>W >1;0ABV 2V4 13.10.2015 @>:C # 413/8074/13-F 70 0?5;OFV9=>N A:0@3>N !_1 =0 70>G=5 @VH5==O @0A=>;CFL:>3> <VAL:>3> AC4C C30=AL:>W >1;0ABV 2V4 24.02.2014 @>:C,
! " :
#E20;>N 2V4 13.10.2015 @>:C 70 0?5;OFV9=>N A:0@3>N !_1 =0 70>G=5 @VH5==O @0A=>;CFL:>3> <VAL:>3> AC4C C30=AL:>W >1;0ABV 2V4 24.02.2014 @>:C C F82V;L=V9 A?@02V 70 ?>7>2>< " «;LD0-0=:» 4> !_1 ?@> ABO3=5==O 701>@3>20=>ABV, ?5;OFV9=89 AC4 C30=AL:>W >1;0ABV ?>25@=C2 <0B5@V0;8 70 707=0G5=>N 0?5;OFV9=>N A:0@3>N 4> >2>?A:>2AL:>3> @09>==>3> AC4C 4;O 28@VH5==O ?8B0==O I>4> 2V4=>2;5==O 2B@0G5=>3> AC4>2>3> ?@>20465==O 70 V=VFV0B82>N AC4C.
0 ?V4AB02V 28:;045=>3>, AC44O 22060T 70 <>6;825 2V4:@8B8 ?@>20465==O C A?@02V ?@> 2V4=>2;5==O 2B@0G5=>3> AC4>2>3> ?@>20465==O C F82V;L=V9 A?@02V 70 ?>7>2>< " «;LD0-0=:» 4> !_1 ?@> ABO3=5==O 701>@3>20=>ABV B0 ?@87=0G8B8 ?> A?@02V AC4>25 70AV40==O.
>1>2?O70B8 AB>@>=8 ?> A?@02V =040B8 AC4C @VH5==O @0A=>;CFL:>3> <VAL:>3> AC4C C30=AL:>W >1;0ABV # 413/8074/13-F 2V4 24.02.2014 @>:C B0 4>:C<5=B8, 01> WE :>?VW, =02VBL O:I> 2>=8 =5 ?>A2V4G5=V 2 CAB0=>2;5=><C ?>@O4:C, I> C =8E 715@53;8AO ?> 707=0G5=V9 A?@02V.
5@CNG8AL AB.AB. 403,209,210 & #:@0W=8, AC44O,
#%:
V4:@8B8 ?@>20465==O C A?@02V ?@> 2V4=>2;5==O 2B@0G5=>3> AC4>2>3> ?@>20465==O C F82V;L=V9 A?@02V # 413/8074/13-F 70 ?>7>2>< " «;LD0-0=:» 4> !_1 ?@> ABO3=5==O 701>@3>20=>ABV.
@87=0G8B8 @>73;O4 A?@028 =0 04 ;8AB>?040 2015 @>:C > 13 3>48=V 00 E28;8=.
04VA;0B8 :>?VN CE20;8 ?@> 2V4:@8BBO ?@>20465==O >A>10<, O:V 15@CBL CG0ABL C A?@02V.
>1>2O70B8 !_1 B0 " «;LD0-0=:» =040B8 AC4C @VH5==O @0A=>;CFL:>3> <VAL:>3> AC4C C30=AL:>W >1;0ABV # 413/8074/13-F 2V4 24.02.2014 @>:C B0 4>:C<5=B8, 01> WE :>?VW, =02VBL O:I> 2>=8 =5 ?>A2V4G5=V 2 CAB0=>2;5=><C ?>@O4:C, I> C =8E 715@53;8AO ?> 707=0G5=V9 A?@02V.
#E20;0 >A:0@65==N =5 ?V4;O30T.
!C44O:
The court decision No. 52990218, Aidar District Court of Luhansk Oblast (until 25.04.2025 - Novopskov District Court of Luhansk Oblast) was adopted on 29.10.2015. The procedural form is Civil, and the decision form is Court ruling. On this page, you will find important data about this court decision. We offer convenient and quick access to actual court decisions so that you can keep up to date with the most recent court precedents. Our database contains the full range of information you need, allowing you to find necessary data easily.
This decision relates to case No. 413/8074/13-ц. Firms, which are mentioned in the text of this judgment: