5;> 3/0506/1473/2012
! "
# +
3>@. >;=>20E0 25 >:BO1@O 20123>40
!C4LO >;=>20EA:>3> @09>==>3> AC40 0;LG5=:> ..
@0AA<>B@52 <0B5@80;K, ?>ABC?82H85 >B >;=>20EA:>3> # 2 >B=>H5=88:
! !_1 =0B>;L528G018.07.1956 3.@>645=8O, C@>65=F0 $ &/_1, 68B5;O $ &/_2, C:@08=F0, 3@0640=8=0 #:@08=K, =5 @01>B0NI53> , 40==K5 ?0A?>@B0 166168 2K40= >;=>20EA:8< 22.03.20123., 40==K5 845=B8D8:0F8>==>3> =><5@0 >BACBAB2CNB, -
2 A>25@H5=88 ?@02>=0@CH5=8O, ?@54CA<>B@5==>3> AB.173-2 G.1 > #:@08=K, -
#!":
21.09.20123. >:>;> 18.40 G0A>2 !_1 =0E>4OAL C A51O 4><0 ?> 04@5AC: A. ;L38=:0 C;. &5=B@0;L=0O 47, =0E>4OAL 2 A>AB>O=88 0;:>3>;L=>3> >?LO=5=8O, CAB@>8; A:0=40; A2>59 3@0640=A:>9 65=5 !_2, 2K@060;AO 2 55 04@5A 3@C1>9 =5F5=7C@=>9 1@0=LN , B> 5ABL A>25@H8; =0A8;85 2 A5<L5 ?A8E>;>38G5A:>3> E0@0:B5@0, 8 ?@02>=0@CH5=85, ?@54CA<>B@5==>5 AB.173-2 G.1 > #:@08=K, GB> ?>4B25@6405BAO 04<8=?@>B>:>;><, ?>OA=5=8O<8 ?@02>=0@CH8B5;O.
!_1 1K; C254><;= > 4=5 A;CH0=8O 45;0 , 2K7K20;AO AC451=>9 ?>25AB:>9, => 2 AC4 =5 O28;AO, =5 A>>1I82 ?@8G8= A2>59 =5O2:8, A 70O2;5=85< 2 AC4 > =5 @0AA<>B@5=88 45;0 2 53> >BACBAB285 =5 >1@0B8;AO 2 A2O78 A G5< 45;> 2 A>>B25BAB288 A> AB.268 > #:@08=K @0AA<0B@820;>AL 2 53> >BACBAB288.
#G8BK20O >1AB>OB5;LAB20 45;0 8 ;8G=>ABL ?@02>=0@CH8B5;O, @C:>2>4AB2COAL AB.AB.283-285, 173-2 G.1 > #:@08=K, -
!":
!_1 ?@87=0BL 28=>2=K< 2 A>25@H5=88 ?@02>=0@CH5=8O ?@54CAA<>B@5==>3> AB. 173-2G.1 > #:@08=K 8 ?>425@3=CBL 04<8=8AB@0B82=><C =0:070=8N 2 2845 HB@0D0 2 4>E>4 3>AC40@AB20 2 AC<<5 85 3@2. (2>A5<45AOB ?OBL 3@2.) =0 @0AG5B=K9 AG5B 31119106700179 34686799 $ 834016 2 # 2 >;=>20EA:>< @09>=5 ## 2 >=5F:>9 >1;0AB8, :>4 ?;0B560 21081100.
>AB0=>2;5=85 <>65B 1KBL >160;>20=> 2 >=5F:89 0?5;;OF8>==K9 AC4 G5@57 >;=>20EA:89 @09>==K9 AC4 2 B5G5=85 10-B8 4=59 A> 4=O 53> 2K=5A5=8O.
>AB0=>2;5=85 <>65B 1KBL ?5@2>=0G0;L=> >1@0I5=> : ?@8=C48B5;L=><C 8A?>;=5=8N 4> 8AB5G5=8O B@5E <5AOF52 A> 4=O 2ABC?;5=8O 53> 2 70:>==CN A8;C,B.5.4> 25.01.20133.
!C4LO:
The court decision No. 50163772, Volnovakha District Court of Donetsk Oblast was adopted on 25.10.2012. The procedural form is On administrative offenses, and the decision form is . On this page, you will find useful data about this court decision. We provide convenient and quick access to actual court decisions so that you can keep up to date with the most recent court precedents. Our database covers the full range of information you need, allowing you to find key data conveniently.
This decision relates to case No. 0506/5738/2012. Companies, which are mentioned in the text of this judgment: