5;> 3/0506/1285/12
! "
# +
3>@. >;=>20E0 20 A5=BO1@O 20123>40
!C4LO >;=>20EA:>3> @09>==>3> AC40 0;LG5=:> ..
@0AA<>B@52 <0B5@80;K, ?>ABC?82H85 >B >;=>20EA:>3> # 2 >B=>H5=88:
"! !_1 0A8;L52=K27.07.19613., C@>65=:8 $ &/_1, 68B5;L=8FK 3.>=5F:0 5B@>2A:>3> @09>=0 C;. )5B8=8=0 11/113 >=5F:>9 >1;0AB8, C:@08=:0, 3@0640=:8 #:@08=K, ?5=A8>=5@:8, 8=20;840 3 3@C??K, 70<C65< , 40==K5 ?0A?>@B0 518190 2K40= 5B@>2A:8< 3. >=5F:0 26.10.20013. ,40==K5 845=B8D8:0F8>==>3> :>40 2248825601, -
2 A>25@H5=88 ?@02>=0@CH5=8O, ?@54CA<>B@5==>3> AB.188 G. 1 > #:@08=K, -
#!":
22.06.20123. 2 10.05 G0A>2 2 >;=>20EA:>9 -120 2> 2@5<O ?@>2545=8O ;8G=>3> 4>A<>B@0 3@.!_1 , ?@8 ?>?KB:5 ?@=5AB8 =0 >E@0=O5<CN 7>=C, 1K;8 >1=0@C65=K 8 87JOBK 45=L38 2 AC<<5 3563@=., 11 4>;;0@>2 !( 8 <>18;L=K9 B5;5D>= HTC, GB> O2;O5BAO 70?@5I5==K< ?@54<5B>< 4;O ?@>=>A0 =0 >E@0=O5<CN B5@@8B>@8N, B> 5ABL A>25@H8;0 ?@02>=0@CH5=85, ?@54CA<>B@5==>5 AB. 188 G. 1 > #:@08=K, GB> ?>4B25@6405BAO 04<8=?@>B>:>;><, ?>OA=5=8O<8 ?@02>=0@CH8B5;O, ?@>B>:>;>< 87JOB8O 70?@5I5==KE ?@54<5B>2, <0B5@80;0<8 45;0.
#G8BK20O >1AB>OB5;LAB20 45;0 8 ;8G=>ABL ?@02>=0@CH8B5;O, @C:>2>4AB2COAL AB.AB.283-285, 188 G. 1 > #:@08=K, -
!":
!_1 ?@87=0BL 28=>2=>9 2 A>25@H5=88 ?@02>=0@CH5=8O, ?@54CA<>B@5==>3> AB. 188 G. 1 > #:@08=K 8 =0;>68BL =0 =55 04<8=8AB@0B82=>5 =0:070=85 2 2845 HB@0D0 2 AC<<5 255 3@2. (425AB8 ?OBL45AOB ?OBL 3@2.) =0 @0AG5B=K9 AG5B 31119106700179 34686799 $ 834016 2 # 2 >;=>20EA:>< @09>=5 ## 2 >=5F:>9 >1;0AB8, A :>=D8A:0F859 45=53 2 AC<<5 356 3@825=(B@8AB0 ?OBL45AOB H5ABL 3@=.), 11(>48==04F0BL) 4>;;0@>2 !(, A>3;0A=> :28B0=F88 8 >B 22.06.20123. E@0=OI85AO 2 >;=>20EA:>9 -120, <>18;L=K9 B5;5D>= "! 2 4>E>4 3>AC40@AB20.
>AB0=>2;5=85 <>65B 1KBL >160;>20=> 2 >=5F:89 0?5;;OF8>==K9 AC4 G5@57 >;=>20EA:89 @09>==K9 AC4 2 B5G5=85 10-B8 4=59 A> 4=O 53> 2K=5A5=8O.
>AB0=>2;5=85 <>65B 1KBL ?5@2>=0G0;L=> >1@0I5=> : ?@8=C48B5;L=><C 8A?>;=5=8N 4> 8AB5G5=8O B@5E <5AOF52 A> 4=O 2K=5A5=8O ?>AB0=>2;5=8O, B.5.4> 20.01.20133.
!C4LO:
The court decision No. 50163706, Volnovakha District Court of Donetsk Oblast was adopted on 20.09.2012. The procedural form is On administrative offenses, and the decision form is . On this page, you will find essential information about this court decision. We offer convenient and quick access to actual court decisions so that you can keep up to date with the most recent court precedents. Our database contains the full range of information you need, allowing you to find useful information conveniently.
This decision relates to case No. 0506/4573/2012. Legal Entities, which are mentioned in the text of this judgment: