5;> 3/0506/855/2012
! "
# +
>@. >;=>20E0 11 8N=O 2012 3>40
!C4LO >;=>20EA:>3> @09>==>3> AC40 0;LG5=:> ..
@0AA<>B@52 <0B5@80;K, ?>ABC?82H85 >B >;=>20EA:>3> # 2 >B=>H5=88:
!_1 22.09.19893., C@>65=F0 $ &/_1, C:@08=F0, 3@0640=8=0 #:@08=K, ?@>6.: $ &/_2, 7 3>40< 6 <5AOF0< ;8H5=8O A2>1>4K A :>=D8A:0F859 8<CI5AB20, 40==K5 ?0A?>@B0 816239 2K40= 8@>2A:8< 3. 0:552:0, 40==K5 845=B8D8:0F8>==>3> =><5@0 >BACBAB2CNB, -
2 A>25@H5=88 ?@02>=0@CH5=8O, ?@54CA<>B@5==>3> AB.187 G. 1 > #:@08=K, -
#!":
07.04.20123. !_1 1C4CG8 ?>4 04<8=8AB@0B82=K< =047>@><, >4=8< 87 >3@0=8G5=89 5<C 1K;> ?@8?8A0=> O2;OBLAO =0 @538AB@0F8N 2 >@30=K 2=CB@5==8E 45; , =5 O28;AO =0 @538AB@0F8N 07.04.20123.,G5< =0@CH8; ?@028;0 CAB0=>2;5==KE 5<C >3@0=8G5=89, B> 5ABL A>25@H8; ?@02>=0@CH5=85, ?@54CA<>B@5==>5 AB.187 G. 1 > #:@08=K, GB> ?>4B25@6405BAO 04<8=?@>B>:>;><, ?>OA=5=8O<8 ?@02>=0@CH8B5;O 8 <0B5@80;0<8 ?@>25@:8.
!_1 1K; C254><;5= > 4=5 A;CH0=8O 45;0 , 2K7K20;AO B0:65 8 AC451=>9 ?>25AB:>9, => 2 AC4 =5 O28;AO, =5 A>>1I82 ?@8G8= A2>59 =5O2:8, A 70O2;5=85< 2 AC4 > =5 @0AA<>B@5=88 45;0 2 53> >BACBAB285 =5 >1@0B8;AO 2 A2O78 A G5< 45;> 2 A>>B25BAB288 A> AB.268 > #:@08=K @0AA<0B@820;>AL 2 53> >BACBAB288.
#G8BK20O >1AB>OB5;LAB20 45;0 8 ;8G=>ABL ?@02>=0@CH8B5;O, @C:>2>4AB2COAL AB.AB.283-285, 289, 187 G. 1 > #:@08=K, -
!":
!_1 ?@87=0BL 28=>2=K< 2 A>25@H5=88 ?@02>=0@CH5=8O ?@54CA<>B@5==>3> AB.187G.1 > #:@08=K 8 ?>425@3=CBL 04<8=8AB@0B82=><C =0:070=8N 2 2845 HB@0D0 2 4>E>4 3>AC40@AB20 2 AC<<5 85 3@2.(2>A5<45AOB ?OBL 3@=.) =0 @0AG5B=K9 AG5B 31119106700179 :>4 21081100 $ 834016 34686799 # 2 >;=>20EA:>< @09>=5 ## 2 >=5F:>9 >1;0AB8.
>AB0=>2;5=85 2ABC?05B 2 70:>==CN A8;C A <><5=B0 53> ?@>2>73;0H5=8O 8 <>65B 1KBL >160;>20=> 2 ?5;;OF8>==K9 AC4 >=5F:89 >1;0AB8 G5@57 >;=>20EA:89 @09>==K9 AC4 2 B5G5=85 10-B8 4=59 A> 4=O 53> 2K=5A5=8O
>AB0=>2;5=85 <>65B 1KBL ?5@2>=0G0;L=> >1@0I5=> : ?@8=C48B5;L=><C 8A?>;=5=8N 2 B5G5=85 B@5E <5AOF52 A> 4=O 2ABC?;5=8O 53> 2 70:>==CN A8;C,B.5.4> 11.09.20123.
!C4LO:
The court decision No. 50163607, Volnovakha District Court of Donetsk Oblast was adopted on 11.06.2012. The procedural form is On administrative offenses, and the decision form is . On this page, you will find essential information about this court decision. We offer convenient and quick access to actual court decisions so that you can keep up to date with the most recent court precedents. Our database contains the full range of information you need, allowing you to find key information conveniently.
This decision relates to case No. 0506/2803/2012. Companies, which are mentioned in the text of this judgment: