5;> 3/0506/734/2012
! "
# +
3. >;=>20E0 14 <0O 2012 3>40
!C4LO >;=>20EA:>3> @09>==>3> AC40, >=5F:>9 >1;0AB8 !_1
@0AA<>B@52 <0B5@80;K, ?>ABC?82H85 >B 3>@. >;=>20E0 # 2 >B=>H5=88
!_2 13.03.19713.@., C@>65=F0 8 68B5;O $ &/_1, 70@538AB@8@>20==>3> $ &/_2, C:@08=F0, 3@0640=8=0 #:@08=K, @01>B05B ;>:><>B82=>5 45?> <0H8=8AB><, >1@07. A@54=5 B5E=8G5A:>5, 65=0B>3> , 8<5NI53> 42>8E =5A>25@H5==>;5B=8E 45B59, 40==K5 ?0A?>@B0 806923 2K40= >;=>20EA:8< 11.05.2011 3., 845=B8D8:0F8>==K9 :>4 _1, -
2 A>25@H5=88 ?@02>=0@CH5=8O, ?@54CA<>B@5==>3> AB.124 > #:@08=K, -
#!":
03.04.20123. 2 08.00G0A. !_2 2 3. >;=>20E0 C?@02;OO B@0=A?>@B=K< A@54AB2>< 02B> _2 2K5760O A 2B>@>AB5?5=>9 4>@>38 A C;.C15=:> =0 C;. 5=8=0 =5 ?@>?CAB8; 02B><>18;L _3 ?>4 C?@02;5=85< !_3, :>B>@0O 42830;0AL ?> 3;02=>9 4>@>35, 2 @57C;LB0B5 G53> ?@>87>H;> " 8 B@0=A?>@B=K5 A@54AB20 ?>;CG8;8 <5E0=8G5A:85 ?>2@5645=8O , G5< =0@CH8; B@51>20=8O ?.16.11 ?@028; 4>@>6=>3> 42865=8O #:@08=K, 8 A>25@H8; ?@02>=0@CH5=85, ?@54CA<>B@5==>5 AB.124 > #:@08=K, GB> ?>4B25@6405BAO 04<8=?@>B>:>;>< 8 ?>OA=5=8O<8 ?@02>=0@CH8B5;O, <0B5@80;0<8 ?@>25@:8.
KA;CH02 ?>OA=5=8O !_2, ?>:0702H53>, GB> >= 2K5760; A> 2B>@>AB5?5==>9 4>@>38 =0 3;02=CN, =5 ?@>?CAB8; 02B><>18;L B.:. 87-70 45@52L52 =5 70<5B8; 53>, 28=C =5 >A?0@820;, 2 A>45O=>< @0A:0O;AO, CG8BK20O >1AB>OB5;LAB20 45;0 8 ;8G=>ABL ?@02>=0@CH8B5;O, @C:>2>4AB2COAL AB.AB. 283-285 8 124 > #:@08=K, -
!":
!_2 ?@87=0BL 28=>2=K< ?> AB. 124 > #:@08=K 8 ?>425@3=CBL 04<8=8AB@0B82=><C =0:070=8N =0:070=8N 2 2845 HB@0D0 2 4>E>4 3>AC40@AB20 2 AC<<5 3403@=.(B@8AB0 A>@>: 3@825=) =0 @/A 3119106700179, 34686799, $ 834016 ## 2 >=5F:>9 >1;0AB8, :>4 4>E>40 21081100.
>AB0=>2;5=85 <>65B 1KBL >160;>20=> 2 ?5;;OF8>==K9 AC4 >=5F:89 >1;0AB8 G5@57 >;=>20EA:89 @09>==K9 AC4 2 B5G5=85 10-B8 4=59 A> 4=O 53> 2K=5A5=8O.
>AB0=>2;5=85 <>65B 1KBL ?5@2>=0G0;L=> >1@0I5=> : ?@8=C48B5;L=><C 8A?>;=5=8N 2 B5G5=85 B@5E <5AOF52 A> 4=O 2ABC?;5=8O 53> 2 70:>==CN A8;C, B.5. 4> 14.08.2012
!C4LO:
The court decision No. 50163535, Volnovakha District Court of Donetsk Oblast was adopted on 14.05.2012. The procedural form is On administrative offenses, and the decision form is . On this page, you will find useful information about this court decision. We offer convenient and quick access to actual court decisions so that you can keep up to date with the most recent court precedents. Our database covers the full range of information you need, allowing you to find necessary information quickly.
This decision relates to case No. 0506/2090/2012. Legal Entities, which are mentioned in the text of this judgment: