5;> 3/0506/551/2012
! "
# +
3. >;=>20E0 20 0?@5;O 2012 3>40
!C4LO >;=>20EA:>3> @09AC40, >=5F:>9 >1;0AB8 !_1
@0AA<>B@52 <0B5@80;K, ?>ABC?82H85 >B >;=>20EA:>3> # 2 >=5F:>9 >1;0AB8 2 >B=>H5=88 !_2 $ &/_1, C@>65=:8 $ &/_2, 68B5;L=8FK A. 0;8=8=>, >;=>20EA:>3> @09>=0, >=5F:>9 >1;0AB8, C;. >;>456=0O 35, 3@0640=:8 #:@08=K, 70<C65<, >48= =/; @515=>:, @01>B0NI59 :;04>2I8:>< 7>2M;5:B@>AB0;L F5E 187, 40==K5 ?0A?>@B0 ! 727062 2K40= >;=>20EA:8< 11.01.20013. 845=B8D8:0F8>==K9 :>4 _1, -
2 A>25@H5=88 ?@02>=0@CH5=8O, ?@54CA<>B@5==>3> AB.184 G.1> #:@08=K, -
#!":
16.03.20123. >:>;> 08.00 G0A>2 !_2 =5 2K?>;=O;0 A2>8 @>48B5;LA:85 >1O70==>AB8 ?> 2>A?8B0=8N, A2>53> =/;5B=53> AK=0 !_2 -26.12.19943.@. , GB> ?@825;> : B><C,GB> >= ?>4@0;AO A =/; !_3 <8B@85<-19953.@. 2 @09>=5 %;51>40@>2A:>3> # , B> 5ABL A>25@H8;0 ?@02>=0@CH5=85, ?@54CA<>B@5==>5 AB.184 G.1 > #:@08=K, GB> ?>4B25@6405BAO 04<8=?@>B>:>;>< 8 ?>OA=5=8O<8 ?@02>=0@CH8B5;O.
KA;CH02 !_2 =5 >A?0@8202H59 A2>59 28=K, ?>OA=82H59, GB> C 55 AK=0 402=> A;>68;8AL =5?@8O7=5==K5 >B=>H5=8O A !_3, 8 >=0 5<C =5>4=>:@0B=> 3>2>@8;0, GB>1K AK= =5 >1@0I0; =0 =53> 2=8<0=8O, => >= ?@>4>;60; : =5<C F5?;OBLAO, ?>MB><C 8 ?@>87>H;0 MB0 4@0:0, 2 A>45O=>< @0A:08205BAO 8 1>;LH5 B0:>5 =5 ?>2B>@8BAO.
#G8BK20O >1AB>OB5;LAB20 45;0 8 ;8G=>ABL ?@02>=0@CH8B5;O, @C:>2>4AB2COAL @C:>2>4AB2COAL AB.AB. 283-285, 289 8 184 G.1 > #:@08=K, -
!":
!_2 ?@87=0BL 28=>2=>9 2 A>25@H5=88 ?@02>=0@CH5=8O ?@54CA<>B@5==>3> G.1 AB.184 > #:@08=K 8 ?>425@3=CBL =0:070=8N 2 2845 HB@0D0 2 4>E>4 3>AC40@AB20 2 AC<<5 17 3@2.(A5<=04F0BL 3@825=) =0 @0AG5B=K9 AG5B 31119106700179 34686799 $ 834016 ## 2 >=5F:>9 >1;0AB8.
>AB0=>2;5=85 <>65B 1KBL >160;>20=> 2 ?5;;OF8>==K9 AC4 >=5F:>9 >1;0AB8 G5@57 >;=>20EA:89 @09>==K9 AC4 2 B5G5=85 10-B8 4=59 A> 4=O 53> 2K=5A5=8O.
>AB0=>2;5=85 <>65B 1KBL ?5@2>=0G0;L=> >1@0I5=> : ?@8=C48B5;L=><C 8A?>;=5=8N 2 B5G5=85 B@5E <5AOF52 A> 4=O 2ABC?;5=8O 53> 2 70:>==CN A8;C, B.5. 4> 20.07.2012.
!C4LO:
The court decision No. 50163521, Volnovakha District Court of Donetsk Oblast was adopted on 20.04.2012. The procedural form is On administrative offenses, and the decision form is . On this page, you will find important information about this court decision. We provide convenient and quick access to actual court decisions so that you can keep up to date with the most recent court precedents. Our database includes the full range of information you need, allowing you to find key information quickly.
This decision relates to case No. 0506/1378/2012. Firms, which are mentioned in the text of this judgment: