5;> 3/0506/618/2012
! "
# +
>@. >;=>20E0 20 0?@5;O 2012 3>40
!C4LO >;=>20EA:>3> @09>==>3> AC40 0;LG5=:> ..
@0AA<>B@52 <0B5@80;K, ?>ABC?82H85 >B >;=>20EA:>3> # 2 >B=>H5=88:
!_1 23.05.19823., C@>65=F0 8 68B5;O $ &/_1, 3@0640=8=0 #:@08=K, =5 @01>B0NI53> , 40==K5 ?0A?>@B0 592257 2K40= !5;84>2A:8< 10.03.20093. , 40==K5 845=B8D8:0F8>==>3> :>40 >BACBAB2CNB ,
2 A>25@H5=88 ?@02>=0@CH5=8O, ?@54CA<>B@5==>3> AB.178 G.3 > #:@08=K, -
#!":
!_1 1C4CG8 ?@82;5G5==K< : 04<8=8AB@0B82=>9 >B25BAB25==>AB8 2=>2L 14.02.2012 3>40 2 16.20 G0A>2 2 3. >;=>20E0 ?> C;. 5=8=0 2>7;5 CG51=>3> 702545=8O !"# 142 C?>B@51;O; A?8@B=K5 =0?8B:8, ?82> '5@=83>2A:>52 :>;8G5AB25 2 ;8B@>2 , B> 5ABL 2 >1I5AB25==>< <5AB5 =0@CH8; >1I5AB25==K9 ?>@O4>: 8 A>25@H8; ?@02>=0@CH5=85, ?@54CA<>B@5==>5 AB.178 G.3 > #:@08=K, GB> ?>4B25@6405BAO 04<8=?@>B>:>;><, ?>OA=5=8O<8 ?@02>=0@CH8B5;O 8 <0B5@80;0<8 45;0.
!_1 2K7K20;AO AC451=>9 ?>25AB:>9, B> 5ABL C254><;5= 1K; =04;560I8< >1@07><, => 2 AC4 =5 O28;AO, =5 A>>1I82 ?@8G8= A2>59 =5O2:8, A 70O2;5=85< 2 AC4 > =5 @0AA<>B@5=88 45;0 2 53> >BACBAB285 =5 >1@0B8;AO 2 A2O78 A G5< 45;> 2 A>>B25BAB288 A> AB.268 > #:@08=K @0AA<0B@820;>AL 2 53> >BACBAB288.
#G8BK20O >1AB>OB5;LAB20 45;0 8 ;8G=>ABL ?@02>=0@CH8B5;O, @C:>2>4AB2COAL AB.AB.283-285, 178 G.3 > #:@08=K, -
!":
!_1 ?@87=0BL 28=>2=K< ?> AB.178G.3 > #:@08=K 8 ?>425@3=CBL 04<8=8AB@0B82=><C =0:070=8N 2 2845 HB@0D0 2 4>E>4 3>AC40@AB20 =0 @0AG5B=K9 AG5B 31119106700179 $ 834016 34686799 :>4 4>E>40 21081300, ?>;CG0B5;L 3>A1N465B >;=>20EA:>3> @09>=0, 2 AC<<5 1363@2. (AB> B@84F0BL H5ABL 3@2.).
>AB0=>2;5=85 2ABC?05B 2 70:>==CN A8;C A <><5=B0 53> ?@>2>73;0H5=8O 8 <>65B 1KBL >160;>20=> 2 ?5;;OF8>==K9 AC4 >=5F:89 >1;0AB8 G5@57 >;=>20EA:89 @09>==K9 AC4 2 B5G5=85 10-B8 4=59 A> 4=O 53> 2K=5A5=8O
>AB0=>2;5=85 <>65B 1KBL ?5@2>=0G0;L=> >1@0I5=> : ?@8=C48B5;L=><C 8A?>;=5=8N 2 B5G5=85 B@5E <5AOF52 A> 4=O 2ABC?;5=8O 53> 2 70:>==CN A8;C, B.5. 4> 20.07.20123.
!C4LO:
The court decision No. 50163487, Volnovakha District Court of Donetsk Oblast was adopted on 20.04.2012. The procedural form is On administrative offenses, and the decision form is . On this page, you will find essential data about this court decision. We offer convenient and quick access to current court decisions so that you can keep up to date with the most recent court precedents. Our database includes the full range of information you need, allowing you to find necessary data conveniently.
This decision relates to case No. 0506/1750/2012. Companies, which are mentioned in the text of this judgment: