221/2992/14-F
2/221/1015/2014
# %
#
<. >;=>20E0 12 25@5A=O 2014@>:C
>;=>20AL:89 @09>==89 AC4, >=5FL:>W >1;0ABV
2 A:;04V: 3>;>2CNG>3> AC44V 0;LG5=:> ..
?@8 A5:@5B0@V !T@8E .!.
@>73;O=C2H8 C 2V4:@8B><C AC4>2><C 70AV40==V <0B5@V0;8 ?> A?@02V ?> ?>7>2V C1;VG=>3> :FV>=5@=>3> ">20@8AB20 " >=5FL:>1;5=5@3> 4> !_1 ?@> ABO3=5==O 701>@3>20=>ABV, -
!":
V4?>2V4=> 4> @VH5==O >;=>20AL:>3> @09AC4C 2V4 11.09.2014@>:C ?> 2:070=V9 A?@02V 1C;> ABO3=CB> 7 !_1 =0 :>@A8BL " " >=5FL:>1;5=5@3> - 11643@2.93:>?N, V ?>=5A5=V ?>7820G5< 28B@0B8 ?> AC4C 2293@2.40:>?.
@VH5==V ?> FV9 A?@02V ?@8?CI5=0 >?8A:0 2 AC<V ABO3=5==O A?;0G5=8E ?>7820G5< AC4>28E 28B@0B - 2:070=> 2293@2.40:>?., 0 73V4=> :2VB0=FVW 1C;> A?;0G5=> 2433@2.60:>?.
!C4, ?5@52V@82H8 <0B5@V0;8 A?@028, 22060T, I> A;V4 28?@028B8 2:070=C >?8A:C, >A:V;L:8 AC4>< 4V9A=> ?@8?CI5=0 >?8A:0 2 =0?8A0==V AC<8 A?;0G5=>3> ?>7820G5< AC4>2>3> 71>@C, A;V4 2:070B8 ABO3=5==O AC<8 AC4>28E 28B@0B 2 AC<V 2433@2.60:>?.
5@CNG8AL AB.219 & #:@0W=8, AC4 -
#%:
=5AB8 28?@02;5==O 2 @VH5==O >;=>20AL:>3> @09>==>3> AC4C ?> F82V;L=V9 A?@02V 2/221/1015/2014 ?> ?>7>2V C1;VG=>3> :FV>=5@=>3> ">20@8AB20 " >=5FL:>1;5=5@3> 4> !_1 ?@> ABO3=5==O 701>@3>20=>ABV - 2 G0AB8=V AC<8 ?>=5A5=8E AC4>28E 28B@0B, 2:0702H8 ?@> ABO3=5==O 7 2V4?>2V40G0 =0 :>@8ABL ?>7820G0 ?>=5A5=V =8< AC4>2V 28B@0B8 2 AC<V 2433@2.60:>?..
V=HV9 G0AB8=V @VH5==O 70;8H8B8 157 7<V=.
#E20;0 <>65 1CB8 >A:0@65=0 4> >=5FL:>3> 0?5;OFV9=>3> AC4C G5@57 >;=>20AL:89 @09>==89 AC4 ?@>BO3>< 5-B8 4=V2 7 4=O WW >3>;>H5==O.
!C44O:
The court decision No. 50162213, Volnovakha District Court of Donetsk Oblast was adopted on 12.09.2014. The procedural form is Civil, and the decision form is Court ruling. On this page, you will find important data about this court decision. We offer convenient and quick access to actual court decisions so that you can keep up to date with the most recent court precedents. Our database contains the full range of information you need, allowing you to find important data quickly.
This decision relates to case No. 221/2992/14-ц. Organisations, which are mentioned in the text of this judgment: