!, /& ! !, !#
__________________
# %
?@> 2V4:;045==O @>73;O4C 0?5;OFV9=>W A:0@38
"19" 15@57=O 2013 @.!?@020 5024/972/2011>;53VO AC44V2 45AL:>3> 0?5;OFV9=>3> 3>A?>40@AL:>3> AC4C C A:;04V:
>;>2CNG>3> AC44V: C4VH52AL:>W ..,
!C44V2: T;O=>2AL:>3> .., 8H:V=>W ..,
?@8 A5:@5B0@V AC4>2>3> 70AV40==O T;O=:V=V9 ..,
70 CG0ABN ?@54AB02=8:V2 AB>@V=:
2V4 ?>7820G0 !_1, 70 4>2V@5=VABN,
2V4 2V4?>2V40G0-1 =5 7O282AO,
2V4 2V4?>2V40G0-2 - =5 7O282AO,
2V4 B@5BL>W >A>18-1 - =5 7O282AO,
2V4 B@5BL>W >A>18-2 =5 7O282AO,
@>73;O=C2H8 C 2V4:@8B><C AC4>2><C 70AV40==V 0?5;OFV9=C A:0@3C C1;VG=>3> 0:FV>=5@=>3> B>20@8AB20 #:@A>F10=:
=0 @VH5==O 3>A?>40@AL:>3> AC4C %5@A>=AL:89 >1;0ABV 2V4 23 6>2B=O 2012 @>:C
C A?@02V 5024/972/2011
70 ?>7>2>< ">20@8AB20 7 >1<565=>N 2V4?>2V40;L=VABN V245=5=5@3>
4> 2V4?>2V40GV2:
1. C1;VG=>3> 0:FV>=5@=>3> B>20@8AB20 #:@A>F10=:
2. @820B=>3> =>B0@VCA0 >2>:0E>2AL:>3> <VAL:>3> =>B0@V0;L=>3> >:@C3C !_2
70 CG0ABN B@5BVE >AV1, O:V =5 70O2;ONBL A0<>ABV9=8E 28<>3 =0 ?@54<5B A?>@C, =0 AB>@>=V 2V4?>2V40G0-1:
1. $V78G=>W >A>18-?V4?@8T<FO !_3
2. $V78G=>W >A>18-?V4?@8T<FO !_4
?@> 287=0==O 4>3>2>@V2 ?@8?8=5=8<8, A?>=C:0==O CAC=CB8 ?5@5H:>48 C 28:>@8AB0==V <09=0 H;OE>< 2G8=5==O ?52=8E 4V9
2AB0=>28;0:
# 72O7:C 7 =5O2:>N 2 AC4>25 70AV40==O ?@54AB02=8:V2 2V4?>2V40GV2 B0 B@5BVE >AV1, 0 B0:>6 =5>1EV4=VABN ?>2=>3> B0 >1T:B82=>3> 4>A;V465==O <0B5@V0;V2 A?@028, AC4>20 :>;53VO 22060T 70 =5>1EV4=5 2V4:;0AB8 @>73;O4 0?5;OFV9=>W A:0@38.
5@CNG8AL AB.AB. 77, 86, 99 #:@0W=8,
:>;53VO AC44V2
CE20;8;0:
1. >73;O4 0?5;OFV9=>W A:0@38 2V4:;0AB8 =0 09 :2VB=O 2013 @>:C > 10:00 3>4.
2. !C4>25 70AV40==O ?@>25AB8 C <. 45A0, ?@. (52G5=:0, 29 - C ?@8<VI5==V 45AL:>3> 0?5;OFV9=>3> 3>A?>40@AL:>3> AC4C 2 70;V AC4>28E 70AV40=L 6, 3-9 ?>25@E, B5;. (0482) 301-447.
>;>2CNG89 AC44O C4VH52AL:0 ..
!C44O T;O=>2AL:89 ..
!C44O 8H:V=0 ..
The court decision No. 50157076, Odesa Commercial Court of Appeal was adopted on 19.03.2013. The procedural form is Economic, and the decision form is Court ruling. On this page, you will find important data about this court decision. We provide convenient and quick access to actual court decisions so that you can keep up to date with the most recent court precedents. Our database contains the full range of information you need, allowing you to find important data easily.
This decision relates to case No. 5024/972/2011. Firms, which are mentioned in the text of this judgment: