!?@020 505/2944/15-?
@>20465==O 3/505/1022/2015
!"
<5=5< #:@0W=8
12.08.2015 @>:C, AC44O >B>2AL:>3> <VAL:@09AC4C 45AL:>W >1;0ABV !_1 @>73;O=C2H8 <0B5@V0;8, O:V =04V9H;8 2V4 >B>2AL:>3> #! #:@0W=8 2 45AL:V9 >1;0ABV ?@> ?@8BO3=5==O 4> 04<V=VAB@0B82=>W 2V4?>2V40;L=>ABV:
!_2, $ &/_1, =5?@0FNNG>3>, <5H:0=FO $ &/_2, 70@5TAB@>20=>3> C $ &/_3, V?= _1
- 70 AB.173 #?,-
2 A B 0 = > 2 8 2 :
3V4=> ?@>B>:>;C ?@> 04<V=VAB@0B82=5 ?@02>?>@CH5==O 0069709 2V4 06.07.2015 @>:C, !_2 05.06.2015 @>:C 1V;O 22 3>48=8 00 E28;8=, 7=0E>4OG8AL C <.>B>2AL: 45AL:>W >1;0ABV, ?@>A?. >B>2AL:>3> =0 AB04V>=V ">:><>B82" 28@0602AO 3>;>A=> =5F5=7C@=>N ;09:>N, =0 70C2065==O ?@0FV2=8:V2 <V;VFVW =5 @503C202, G8< ?>@CH82 3@><04AL:89 ?@02>?>@O4>:, B>1B> 2G8=82 4@V1=5 EC;V30=AB2>.
"0:8< G8=><, C 4VOE !_2 210G0NBLAO >7=0:8 ?@02>?>@CH5==O, ?5@5410G5=>3> AB.173 #?.
- 5@CNG8AL AB.AB.27, 40-1, 173, 283, 284 #?, AC44O
!":
!_2 287=0B8 28==8< C A:>T=V 04<V=VAB@0B82=>3> ?@02>?>@CH5==O, ?5@5410G5=>3> AB.173 #? B0 ?@87=0G8B8 9><C 04<V=VAB@0B82=5 ABO3=5==O C 283;O4V HB@0DC C AC<V 51 (?'OB45AOB >4=0) 3@82=O.
!BO3=CB8 7 !_2 =0 :>@8ABL 45@6028, AC4>289 71V@ C AC<V 36 (B@84FOBL HVABL) 3@825=L 54 :>?V9:8 - >B@8<C20G :>HBV2 # C >B>2AL:><C @09>=C, :>4 # 23214672, @/@ 31215206700019, 10=: >B@8<C20G # 2 45AL:V9 >1;0ABV, :>4 10=:C >B@8<C20G0 828011, :>4 4>E>4V2 1N465BC 23030001, B5@8B>@VO <. >B>2AL:.
!:0@3C =0 ?>AB0=>2C ?> A?@02V ?@> 04<V=VAB@0B82=5 ?@02>?>@CH5==O <>65 1CB8 ?>40=> ?@>BO3>< 45AOB8 4=V2 7 4=O 28=5A5==O ?>AB0=>28.
!C44O
The court decision No. 50146513, Podilsk City and District Court of Odesa Oblast (until 25.04.2025 - Kotovsk City and District Court of Odesa Oblast) was adopted on 12.08.2015. The procedural form is On administrative offenses, and the decision form is . On this page, you will find useful data about this court decision. We offer convenient and quick access to actual court decisions so that you can keep up to date with the most recent court precedents. Our database contains the full range of information you need, allowing you to find necessary data quickly.
This decision relates to case No. 505/2944/15-п. Organisations, which are mentioned in the text of this judgment: