0B0 4>:C<5=BC 10.03.2011
!?@020 3-964/11
@>20465==O
!"
#
10 15@57=O 2011@. AC44O 5=V=AL:>3> @09>==>3> AC4C <. 0?>@V66O 0EV1>@>40 .., @>73;O=C2H8 <0B5@V0;8, O:V =04V9H;8 7 ! 4;O 74V9A=5==O AC?@>2>465==O C 2V4=>H5==V: !_1, $ &/_1, 3@><04O=8=0 #:@0W=8, O:89 =5 ?@0FNT, <5H:0T 70 04@5A>N: !_1
70 AB. 130 G. 1 #?, -
2 A B 0 = > 2 8 2:
19.02.2011 @. > 02-00 3>4., 3@. !_1, :5@C202 B@0=A?>@B=8< 70A>1>< <0@:8 -2109, 4.=. _1, =0 2C;. 030@V=0 2 A. 0B2VW2:0, 2 AB0=V =0@:>B8G=>3> A?O=V==O, I> ?V4B25@46CTBLAO 0:B>< <548G=>3> >3;O4C, 73V4=> O:>3> 3@. !_1 ?5@51C202 C AB0=V =0@:>B8G=>3> A?O=V==O, 28:;8:0=>3> 26820==O< <0@VEC0=8. !2>W<8 4VO<8 3@. !_1 ?>@CH82 ?. 2.9 #:@0W=8. V4 :5@C20==O B@0=A?>@B=8< 70A>1>< CAC=5=89.
AC4>2><C 70AV40==V !_1 A2>N 28=C C 2G8=5=><C ?@02>?>@CH5==V 287=02 C ?>2=><C >1AO7V. > B>3> 6, 9>3> 28=0 C 2G8=5=><C ?@02>?>@CH5==V ?V4B25@46CTBLAO <0B5@V0;0<8 40=>W A?@028, 0 A0<5: ?@>B>:>;>< ?@> 04<V=VAB@0B82=5 ?@02>?>@CH5==O 1 141592 2V4 19.02.2010 @., ?8AL<>28<8 ?>OA=5==O A2V4:V2 B0 4>2V4:>N .
5@CNG8AL AB.AB. 130 G.1 >45:AC #:@0W=8 ?@> 04<V=VAB@0B82=V ?@02>?>@CH5==O, AC44O
? > A B 0 = > 2 8 2:
0:;0AB8 =0 !_1 HB@0D 2 4>E>4 45@6028 (@/@ 31118149700006, >B@8<C20G 45@61N465B 5=V=AL:>3> @09>=C, 10=: >B@8<C20G0 # 2 0?>@V7L:V9 >1;0ABV, :>4 >B@8<C20G0 34677103, $ 813015, :>4 ?;0B56C 21081300) 2 @>7<V@V 2550 (42V B8AOGV ?OBA>B ?OB45AOB ) 3@=. 00 :>?.
>AB0=>20 <>65 1CB8 >A:0@65=0 C 10-45==89 AB@>: H;OE>< ?>40==O 0?5;OFV9=>W A:0@38 G5@57 AC4 ?5@H>W V=AB0=FVW.
!C44O: 0EV1>@>40 . .
The court decision No. 50136039, Dnipro District Court of Zaporizhzhia City (until 25.04.2025 - Leninskyi District Court of Zaporizhzhia City) was adopted on 10.03.2011. The procedural form is On administrative offenses, and the decision form is . On this page, you will find essential information about this court decision. We offer convenient and quick access to current court decisions so that you can keep up to date with the most recent court precedents. Our database includes the full range of information you need, allowing you to find useful information quickly.
This decision relates to case No. 3-964/11. Firms, which are mentioned in the text of this judgment: