!?@020 0809/5676/2012
0B53>@VO 9
! "
#
12.10.2012 @>:C AC44O 02>4AL:>3> @09>==>3> AC4C <. 0?>@V66O T@:C;>20 .., @>73;O=C2H8 <0B5@V0;8, O:V =04V9H;8 7 02>4AL:>3> # #! #:@0W=8 2 0?>@V7L:V9 >1;0ABV ?@> ?@8BO3=5==O 4> 04<V=VAB@0B82=>W 2V4?>2V40;L=>ABV !_1, $ &/_1, 3@><04O=8=0 #:@0W=8, =5 ?@0FNNG>3>, O:89 <5H:0T 70 04@5A>N: !_1
- 70 AB. 44 G. 1 >45:AC #:@0W=8 ?@> 04<V=VAB@0B82=V ?@02>?>@CH5==O,-
!":
25.0-.2012 1V;O 1C48=:C 11 ?> 2C;. @46>=V:V475 2 <. 0?>@V66O, !_1 =5 70:>==> 715@V302 ?@8 A>1V @5G>28=C AV@>-75;5=>3> :>;L>@C @>A;8==>3> ?>E>465==O ( :0=01VA/ <0@VEC0=0) 157 <5B8 71CBC. 3V4=> 28A=>2:C A?5FV0;VAB0 3683 2V4 01.10.2012 @.
AC4>2><C 70AV40==V !_1 28=C C 2G8=5==V 40=>3> ?@02>?>@CH5==O 287=02 ?>2=VABN.
8=0 !_1 ?V4B25@46CTBLAO ?@>B>:>;>< ?@> 04<V=VAB@0B82=5 ?@02>?>@CH5==O A5@VW 076352 2V4 03.10.2012 @>:C, 7V 7<VAB>< O:>3> !_1 >7=09><;5=89 B0 V=H8<8 <0B5@V0;0<8 A?@028, 0 A0<5: @0?>@B, ?>OA=5==O ?@02>?>@CH=8:0, B><C 2V= ?V4;O30T 04<V=VAB@0B82=V9 2V4?>2V40;L=>ABV 70 AB.44 G.1 #?.
5@CNG8AL AB. AB. 44 G. 1, 245, 268, 283, 284 >45:AC #:@0W=8 ?@> 04<V=VAB@0B82=V ?@02>?>@CH5==O, AC4
!":
!_1, ?@8BO3=CB8 4> 04<V=VAB@0B82=>W 2V4?>2V40;L=>ABV 70 AB. 44 G. 1 #? B0 =0:;0AB8 04<V=VAB@0B82=5 ABO3=5==O C 283;O4V HB@0DC 2 AC<V 425 3@=. =0 :>@8ABL 45@6028 (0=: ## 2 0?>@V7L:V9 >1;0ABV @/A 31119106700004, $ 813015, # 34677136, :>4 ?;0B56C 21081100, >45@6C20G: 45@602=89 1N465B 2 02>4AL:><C @09>=V).
3V4=> 4> G. 2 AB. 308 #? C ?>@O4:C ?@8<CA>2>3> 28:>=0==O ?>AB0=>28 ?@> ABO3=5==O HB@0DC 70 2G8=5==O 04<V=VAB@0B82=>3> ?@02>?>@CH5==O 7 ?@02>?>@CH=8:0 ABO3CTBLAO ?>42V9=89 @>7<V@ HB@0DC, 287=0G5=>3> C 2V4?>2V4=V9 AB0BBV FL>3> >45:AC.
>AB0=>20 <>65 1CB8 >A:0@65=0 01> =0 =5W <>65 1CB8 2=5A5=> ?@>B5AB ?@>:C@>@0 4> 0?5;OFV9=>3> AC4C 0?>@V7L:>W >1;0ABV G5@57 02>4AL:89 @09>==89 AC4 <. 0?>@V66O H;OE>< ?>40GV 2 10-45==89 AB@>: 7 4=O 28=5A5==O ?>AB0=>28 0?5;OFV9=>W A:0@38 01> ?@>B5ABC ?@>:C@>@0.
!C44O: ..T@:C;>20
The court decision No. 50134694, Zavodskyi District Court of Zaporizhzhia City was adopted on 12.10.2012. The procedural form is On administrative offenses, and the decision form is . On this page, you will find important information about this court decision. We provide convenient and quick access to current court decisions so that you can keep up to date with the most recent court precedents. Our database includes the full range of information you need, allowing you to find key information quickly.
This decision relates to case No. 0809/5676/2012. Firms, which are mentioned in the text of this judgment: