!?@020 0809/5025/2012
0B53>@VO 294
! "
#
07.09.2012 @>:C AC44O 02>4AL:>3> @09>==>3> AC4C <. 0?>@V66O T@:C;>20 .. @>73;O=C2H8 <0B5@V0;8, O:V =04V9H;8 7 02>4AL:>3> # #! #:@0W=8 2 0?>@V7L:V9 >1;0ABV ?@> ?@8BO3=5==O 4> 04<V=VAB@0B82=>W 2V4?>2V40;L=>ABV 2V4=>A=> !_1, $ &/_1, C@>465=FO $ &/_2, 3@><04O=8=0 #:@0W=8, =5 ?@0FNNG>3>, <5H:0T 70 04@5A>N: !_1 /V=H8E 2V4><>AB59 =5<0T/,
AB. 187 G.1 >45:AC #:@0W=8 ?@> 04<V=VAB@0B82=V ?@02>?>@CH5==O, AC4 -
!":
@-= !_1 29.08.2012@>:C > 22-15 3>48=V ?V4 G0A ?5@52V@:8 1C2 2V4ACB=V9 70 <VAF5< ?@>6820==O, G8< ?>@CH82 ?@028;0 04<V=VAB@0B82=>3> =03;O4C.
AC4>2><C 70AV40==V !_1 28=C 287=02 ?>2=VABN.
8=0 ?V4B25@46CTBLAO ?@>B>:>;>< ?@> 04<V=VAB@0B82=5 ?@02>?>@CH5==O A5@VW 082937 2V4 05.09.2012 @>:C, 7V 7<VAB>< O:>3> 2V= 1C2 >7=09><;5=89 B0 73>45=, @0?>@B><, 0 B0:>6 V=H8<8 <0B5@V0;0<8 A?@028.
"0:8< G8=>< 1C;> 2AB0=>2;5=>, I> 2 4VOE !_1 210G0TBLAO A:;04 04<V=VAB@0B82=>3> ?@02>?>@CH5==O, ?5@5410G5=>3> G.1 AB.187 #?, 0 A0<5 ?>@CH5==O ?@028; 04<V=VAB@0B82=>3> =03;O4C, B><C 2V= ?V4;O30T ?@8BO3=5==N 4> 2V4?>2V40;L=>ABV 7 =0:;040==O< ABO3=5==O C 283;O4V HB@0DC.
5@CNG8AL AB.AB. 187 G.1, 245, 268, 283, 284 G.1, 294 #?, -
!":
!_1,, ?@8BO3=CB8 4> 04<V=VAB@0B82=>W 2V4?>2V40;L=>ABV 70 AB. 187 G.1 #? V =0:;0AB8 04<V=VAB@0B82=5 ABO3=5==O C 283;O4V HB@0DC C @>7<V@V 51 3@=. =0 :>@8ABL 45@6028 (10=: #C 2 0?>@V7L:V9 >1;0ABV, @/@ 31119106700004, $ 813015, # 34677136, :>4 ?;0B56C 21081100 45@602=89 1N465B C 02>4AL:><C @09>=V).
3V4=> 4> G. 2 AB. 308 #? C ?>@O4:C ?@8<CA>2>3> 28:>=0==O ?>AB0=>28 ?@> ABO3=5==O HB@0DC 70 2G8=5==O 04<V=VAB@0B82=>3> ?@02>?>@CH5==O 7 ?@02>?>@CH=8:0 ABO3CTBLAO ?>42V9=89 @>7<V@ HB@0DC, 287=0G5=>3> C 2V4?>2V4=V9 AB0BBV FL>3> >45:AC.
>AB0=>20 <>65 1CB8 >A:0@65=0 01> =0 =5W <>65 1CB8 2=5A5=> ?@>B5AB ?@>:C@>@0 4> 0?5;OFV9=>3> AC4C 0?>@V7L:>W >1;0ABV G5@57 02>4AL:89 @09>==89 AC4 <. 0?>@V66O H;OE>< ?>40GV 2 10-45==89 AB@>: 7 4=O 28=5A5==O ?>AB0=>28 0?5;OFV9=>W A:0@38 01> ?@>B5ABC ?@>:C@>@0.
!C44O ..T@:C;>20
The court decision No. 50134587, Zavodskyi District Court of Zaporizhzhia City was adopted on 07.09.2012. The procedural form is On administrative offenses, and the decision form is . On this page, you will find important data about this court decision. We provide convenient and quick access to current court decisions so that you can keep up to date with the most recent court precedents. Our database covers the full range of information you need, allowing you to find necessary data quickly.
This decision relates to case No. 0809/5025/2012. Companies, which are mentioned in the text of this judgment: