!?@020 0809/1026/2012
0B53>@VO 192
! "
#
19.04.2012 @>:C AC44O 02>4AL:>3> @09>==>3> AC4C <. 0?>@V66O T@:C;>20 .., @>73;O=C2 <0B5@V0;, I> =04V9H>2 7 C 02>4AL:><C @09>=V <. 0?>@V66O ?@> ?@8BO3=5==O 4> 04<V=VAB@0B82=>W 2V4?>2V40;L=>ABV: !_1, $ &/_1, ?@0FNNG>3>: 3>;>2=8< 1CE30;B5@>< " «;5:B@><5B0;C@3V9=89 702>4 «=V?@>A?5FAB0;L»V<. ..C7L<V=0, O:0 <5H:0T 70 04@5A>N: <. =V?@>?5B@>2AL: , 2C;. 5@>W2 3@><04O=AL:>W 2V9=8 17 :2.50 (V=H8E 2V4><>AB59 =5 2V4><>);
- 70 AB. 163-1 G.2 #? #:@0W=8,
!":
3V4=> ?@>B>:>;C A5@VW 328532 2V4 18.01.2012 @>:C, ?@8 ?5@52V@FV " «;5:B@><5B0;C@3V9=89 702>4 «=V?@>A?5FAB0;L»V<.. !_2, 1C;> 2AB0=>2;5=> ?>@CH5==O 2AB0=>2;5=>3> 70:>=>< ?>@O4:C 2545==O ?>40B:>2>3> >1;V:C, O:5 ?@8725;> 4> 7028I5==O AC<8 1N465B=>3> 2V4H:>4C20==O 70 ;8AB>?04 2011@>:C, =0 7030;L=C AC<C 437884,0 3@=. !_2 8/06-01/00186536 2V4 06.01.2012@>:C.
>73;O=C2H8 4>:078 ?> 04<V=VAB@0B82=V9 A?@02V, 0 A0<5: ?@>B>:>; ?@> 04<V=VAB@0B82=5 ?@02>?>@CH5==O A5@VW 328532 2V4 18.01.2012 @>:C, 0:B 8/06-01/00186536 2V4 06.01.2012@>:C ?@89<0NG8 4> C2038 B5, I> B@L>E<VAOG=89 AB@>: ?@8BO3=5==O 4> 04<V=VAB@0B82=>W 2V4?>2V40;L=>ABV !_1 70:V=G82AO , AC4 4V9H>2 28A=>2:C, I> 40=0 A?@020 ?V4;O30T 70:@8BBN.
3V4=> G.1 AB.38 #? 04<V=VAB@0B82=5 ABO3=5==O <>65 1CB8 =0:;045=> =5 ?V7=VH5 O: G5@57 B@8 <VAOFV 7 4=O 2G8=5==O ?@02>?>@CH5==O.
"0:8< G8=><, C 2V4?>2V4=>ABV 7 ?. 7 AB. 247 #? ?@>20465==O ?> A?@02V ?@> 04<V=VAB@0B82=5 ?@02>?>@CH5==O ?V4;O30T 70:@8BBN 2 72O7:C 7 70:V=G5==O< AB@>:C =0 <><5=B @>73;O4C A?@028.
5@CNG8AL AB.AB. 38G.1, 247 ?.7, 268, 283, 284 >45:AC #:@0W=8 ?@> 04<V=VAB@0B82=V ?@02>?>@CH5==O , AC4
!":
@>20465==O C A?@02V ?@> ?@8BO3=5==O 4> 04<V=VAB@0B82=>W 2V4?>2V40;L=>ABV !_1 70 AB. 163-1 G.2 >45:AC #:@0W=8 ?@> 04<V=VAB@0B82=V ?@02>?>@CH5==O 70:@8B8, C 72O7:C 7 70:V=G5==O< AB@>:C ?@8BO3=5==O 4> 04<V=VAB@0B82=>W 2V4?>2V40;L=>ABV.
>AB0=>20 ?V4;O30T >A:0@65==N ?@>BO3>< 10 4=V2 7 4=O 28=5A5==O.
!C44O: ..T@:C;>20
The court decision No. 50134273, Zavodskyi District Court of Zaporizhzhia City was adopted on 19.04.2012. The procedural form is On administrative offenses, and the decision form is . On this page, you will find key data about this court decision. We offer convenient and quick access to current court decisions so that you can keep up to date with the most recent court precedents. Our database includes the full range of information you need, allowing you to find important data conveniently.
This decision relates to case No. 0809/1026/2012. Firms, which are mentioned in the text of this judgment: